Saturday 12 December 2015

Western Dressage is Classical Dressage in Western Tack! -(Done Correctly That Is)


The following article is my own personal opinion about Western Dressage. 
I write this from experience of teaching dressage principles to Western riders for over 35 years. My teaching style whether it's in English tack, or Western never changes. It's Classical Dressage. 


I think that anyone will agree that Dressage simply defined is the French word for training. You can dressage your cat, dog, horse, even your children.  What I can't agree on is a dressage custom built for every single horse event, club, or new type of riding test. Dressage principles are hundreds of years old. Schools are built on centuries of  experience, traditions and valid success.  The world wide web has created a marketing frenzy on who is going to out do the next riding Dressage in Western tack. 
In my opinion, it's not promoting the art of Western Dressage (if you ride in Western tack), it's splintering it beyond repair. 
For example, there is Cow'ssage, Cowboy Dressage, Cowgirl Dressage, Ranch Western Dressage, and I'm sure that there are more out there if I Google a little harder. Within the trademarked titles exists many enthusiasts, trainers, coaches, riders and the like who claim have taken an interest in Dressage by the title, but claim that it is not really dressage. Confused yet?
Now, with every different nuance of the new disciplines, there seems to be a different take on every different type of dressage (but remember that the claims are abundant that it's really not real dressage). I am seeing interpretations of Dressage that I have never heard about. I'm speaking from experience as and I have been studying it now for 45 years, and I have learned from the best in the world with instructors that had been taught by masters from the 19th century and those masters who had learned from their predecessors. I've trained horses and ridden to the highest levels.
The fracturing of the dressage sport to the Western style of riding has become almost on the point of epidemic. Instead of keeping one definitive new discipline, it's become a frenzy of a dog eat dog world. Can't we just all agree on calling it Dressage? If you ride Western, then Western Dressage?
If your marketing ploy is to tell the world that your world of X Dressage is built on "Soft Feel" "Light contact", or  to change the training scale of the German system, I question the motives. This also includes claiming your dressage is different because your ring size is not that of traditional dressage arenas, then in my opinion people marketing this way have no actual clue about what true classical dressage is. True dressage is based on the balance, bio-mechanical correctness and progressive training of the horse and rider. It does not involve pushing, pulling, spurring or jabbing the horse in the mouth or using any type of head-setting device. It is a very structured ballet between horse and rider. Each movement progressive to the next. Dressage done correctly takes a lifetime to learn, and then some. If you attend lessons or clinics with trainers boasting the latest and greatest draw reins, German Martingales or curb bits on young horses, run don't walk away. You have the right to ask any clinician about their background, and don't be afraid to look for yourself.
I still find it very difficult to comprehend why all these different branches of riding are attempting to differentiate  themselves that they are not dressage, but they are keeping the word. The claims of "it's not dressage in western tack" is beyond ludicrous. 
If you are not using dressage principles to train your western style horses, then you are not doing dressage. Please change the name. 



1 comment:

  1. Just read an article in Equus magazine about "Cowboy Dressage", the soft feel, rules being written, rings being smaller and I thought to myself "Why". We have Western Dressage. Dressage in Western tack. Why are there so many splinter groups? Thank you Elaine for that wonderful post. You are right on the money.

    ReplyDelete